Editorial Policy

📜 Content Integrity & Standards

Editorial Policy

Public-Record.org is committed to publishing accurate, verified, and genuinely helpful public records information. This page explains how we create, verify, review, and maintain our content — and the standards every article on this site must meet before publication.

1. Purpose & Scope of This Policy

This Editorial Policy governs all informational and educational content published on Public-Record.org — including state guides, county public records pages, record-type explainers, how-to guides, and frequently asked questions. It applies to every member of our editorial team: researchers, writers, editors, and fact-checkers.

Our goal is to be the most accurate, practical, and trustworthy independent resource for navigating U.S. public records. This policy exists to protect that standard and to hold our team accountable to readers who rely on our information for real-life decisions.

⚠️ Important: Public-Record.org is an independent, privately-operated website. We are not affiliated with any government agency at the federal, state, county, or local level. We do not host, store, or provide direct access to any government records. Our content is educational and informational only.

2. Content Creation Standards

Every article published on Public-Record.org must meet the following non-negotiable standards:

2.1 — Verified Official Sources Only

All government website URLs, phone numbers, physical office addresses, fee schedules, and form references cited in our content are sourced from official government websites (.gov domains), verified county clerk portals, state judiciary systems, or other confirmed primary sources.

We never use placeholder data, assumed URLs, or fabricated contact information. If an official source cannot be located or verified for a specific jurisdiction, we either omit that data point and clearly state that it is unavailable, or mark it with a visible [VERIFY] tag for our editorial team to resolve before publication.

2.2 — No Broken Links Published

Every external link in every article is manually tested before publication to confirm it loads correctly and points to the intended destination. Links that return 404 errors, redirect to unrelated pages, or lead to parked/expired domains are never published. Our content review checklist includes a mandatory link verification step.

2.3 — Actionable & Practical Information

We do not publish generic, surface-level overviews. Every guide on Public-Record.org must provide specific, actionable information that a reader can immediately use — including the exact official website to visit, the specific form to fill out, the phone number to call, the fee amount, the processing time, and the step-by-step process from start to finish.

Our editorial standard is: “Can a first-time user follow this guide from beginning to end without getting stuck or needing to search elsewhere?” If the answer is no, the article goes back for revision.

2.4 — Local Accuracy & County-Specific Detail

Public records access varies significantly between states and counties. We do not apply generic, one-size-fits-all guidance across jurisdictions. Each state and county guide includes jurisdiction-specific details: the correct local office name, the correct website URL for that specific county, local phone numbers, embedded Google Maps for office locations, local fee structures, and any county-specific tips or processing notes.

2.5 — Complete Schema Markup

All articles include structured data (JSON-LD schema markup) to help search engines understand and correctly display our content. Depending on the page type, this may include Article, GovernmentService, LocalBusiness, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList, HowTo, and WebPage schema types — each populated with accurate, verified data matching the visible page content.

3. Human Editorial Review Process

No article is published on Public-Record.org without passing through a structured human review process. Here is how every piece of content moves from research to publication:

1
Research & Data Collection — Our research team identifies the relevant government offices, websites, phone numbers, addresses, fees, and processes for each jurisdiction. All data is sourced from primary official sources.
2
Content Drafting — A writer creates the article using verified research data. The article follows our standard content template, which includes required sections: Quick Action Box, contact information table, step-by-step guide, FAQ section, and embedded Google Map.
3
Link & Data Verification — Every external URL is manually clicked and tested. Every phone number is cross-referenced against the official government source. Every address is confirmed. Fee amounts are verified against official fee schedule pages. Any unverifiable item is flagged for resolution.
4
Editorial Review & Fact-Check — A separate editor (not the original writer) reviews the complete article for factual accuracy, completeness, readability, proper disclaimer placement, and compliance with this editorial policy.
5
Publication — Only after passing all verification and editorial review steps is the article published on the live site with full SEO metadata, schema markup, and proper internal linking.
6
Ongoing Monitoring & Updates — Published articles enter our content audit cycle. We periodically re-check links, verify contact details, and update information as government websites and processes change.

4. AI-Assisted Content Disclosure

In the interest of full transparency, we disclose that some content on Public-Record.org is produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Here is exactly how AI is used — and how it is not used — in our content process:

✔️ How AI Is Used:
AI tools may assist with initial content drafting, structuring article templates, generating FAQ sections, and formatting structured data markup. AI is used as a productivity tool to help our team produce content more efficiently at scale.
❌ How AI Is NOT Used:
AI-generated content is never published without human review. All factual data — including government website URLs, phone numbers, physical addresses, fee amounts, and step-by-step procedures — is independently verified by a human researcher against official sources before publication. AI does not replace our verification process; it supplements our writing workflow.

Every article on this site, regardless of whether AI tools assisted in its creation, undergoes the same human editorial review and fact-checking process described in Section 3 above. Our commitment to accuracy is not diminished by the use of AI tools — it is enforced by human oversight at every stage.

5. Source Hierarchy & Linking Standards

We follow a strict source priority when linking to external resources in our content:

Priority Source Type Examples
1st (Primary) Official government websites .gov domains, official county clerk portals, state judiciary search pages, vital records office sites
2nd Verified government-affiliated portals State-authorized e-filing systems, court-approved online search tools, official PACER system
3rd Established reference sources National Archives (archives.gov), U.S. Census data, Bureau of Justice Statistics
4th (Supplementary) Third-party databases & tools People search services, background check providers — always clearly labeled as third-party with appropriate disclosure

We always prioritize linking to free official government resources over paid third-party services. Third-party tools are referenced only as supplementary options and are clearly disclosed as non-government services with appropriate affiliate or sponsored link disclosures where applicable.

6. Corrections & Error Reporting

Accuracy is our highest editorial priority. Government websites change frequently — offices move, phone numbers update, URLs restructure, fees change, and online portals get redesigned. Despite our best efforts, errors can occur. Here is how we handle them:

How to Report an Error

If you find incorrect information on any page — a broken link, wrong phone number, outdated fee, incorrect address, or any other factual error — please email us immediately at contact@public-record.org with the following details:

The URL of the page containing the error
A description of the incorrect information
The correct information (if known) and its source

Our Correction Process

Critical errors (broken official links, wrong phone numbers, incorrect government office information) are corrected within 24–48 hours of being reported and verified.

Non-critical updates (fee changes, minor process updates, formatting improvements) are addressed during our regular content audit cycle.

When a significant correction is made, we update the article’s “Last Updated” date to reflect the change. We do not silently alter published content without updating the revision date.

7. Content Audit & Update Schedule

Published content is not static. We conduct periodic audits to maintain accuracy:

What We Audit

External link integrity — Testing all government URLs for 404 errors, redirects, and domain changes
Phone number accuracy — Cross-referencing published numbers against current official listings
Fee schedule updates — Checking for updated filing fees, copy fees, and processing fees
Process changes — Identifying new online portals, changed application procedures, or updated form requirements
Office location changes — Verifying physical addresses and office hours remain accurate
Google Maps embed accuracy — Confirming embedded maps point to the correct location

High-traffic pages and pages covering frequently-changing jurisdictions are audited more frequently. All articles display a “Last Updated” date so readers can assess the recency of the information.

8. Affiliate & Advertising Disclosure Policy

💰 How We Fund This Site

Public-Record.org is a free-to-use informational resource. We earn revenue through affiliate partnerships with third-party people search and background check services. When you click on certain links or widgets on our site and complete a purchase or sign up for a paid service, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you.

8.1 — Editorial Independence

Our affiliate relationships do not influence our editorial content. Government links, official contact details, step-by-step instructions, fee information, and all factual content are produced independently of any advertising or affiliate relationship. We will never substitute a paid third-party service in place of a free official government resource.

8.2 — Clear Affiliate Disclosure

All affiliate links and sponsored widgets on our site are clearly identified with appropriate disclosures such as “Sponsored,” “Affiliate Link,” or a disclosure statement near the relevant content. All affiliate links include rel="nofollow noopener sponsored" attributes in compliance with Google’s Webmaster Guidelines and FTC endorsement disclosure requirements.

8.3 — No Deceptive Practices

We do not use deceptive design patterns that disguise affiliate widgets as official government search tools. Third-party search widgets are clearly labeled as non-government services. We do not use misleading language such as “Official Records Search” for any paid third-party tool.

9. Legal & Compliance Disclaimers

9.1 — Not a Government Website

Public-Record.org is a privately-operated informational website. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any federal, state, county, or local government agency. Any resemblance in name or branding to any government entity is coincidental and not intended to imply government affiliation.

9.2 — Not Legal Advice

Nothing published on this website constitutes legal advice, professional counsel, or a substitute for consultation with a qualified attorney. Public records laws vary significantly by state and jurisdiction. Readers should consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to their legal situation.

9.3 — FCRA Compliance

Public-Record.org is not a consumer reporting agency as defined by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Information available on this website does not constitute a “consumer report” under the FCRA. You may not use information obtained from this website for purposes of evaluating consumer credit, employment screening, tenant screening, insurance underwriting, or any other purpose governed by the FCRA.

9.4 — Accuracy Limitation

While we take extensive steps to verify all information published on this site, we cannot guarantee that every data point is current or error-free at all times. Government agencies update their websites, change their contact information, modify fees, and restructure processes without notice. We encourage readers to verify critical information directly with the relevant official agency before making important decisions.

10. Editorial Team Accountability

This editorial policy is binding on every member of our content team. Every researcher, writer, editor, and fact-checker working on Public-Record.org content is expected to understand and follow these standards. Content that does not meet these standards is not published.

Our editorial leadership is responsible for enforcing this policy, conducting periodic content quality audits, and updating this policy as our standards evolve. Any questions about this policy or its application should be directed to our editorial team at contact@public-record.org.

📝 Policy Review Schedule: This Editorial Policy is reviewed and updated at least once annually, or more frequently if significant changes to our content process, legal requirements, or industry best practices require it. The “Last Updated” date below reflects the most recent revision.

📨 Questions or Concerns?

If you have questions about our editorial standards, want to report an error,
or have feedback about our content — we want to hear from you.

Email: contact@public-record.org

This Editorial Policy was last reviewed and updated on April 2026.
Public-Record.org — Independent Public Records Research & Education